Chuck on the right side
THIS IS A BLOG THAT TRIES TO APPEAL TO THE AVERAGE CONSERVATIVE CITIZEN AND HAS NO AGENDA OTHER THAN TELLING THE TRUTH AS WE SEE IT.
Now that information has finally come out that the Democrats were “palsy-walsy” with foreign countries, including Russia and China, you wonder why the media was so quiet before the last election, when they knew details of those collusions.
For over 3 years, the Democrats were bellowing Russia, Russia, Russia, claiming that President Trump was a willing stooge of Russia and Vladimir Putin. It was finally proven to be a colossal hoax by Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigating team. Many of the politicians who pushed that false narrative, are now involved in their own scandal, this time with actual facts to back up those claims of malfeasance. Isn't it amazing that since Joe Biden is the presumed President-Elect, the media now seems fit to now cover these stories of foreign involvement with the Democrats, rather reluctantly?
Under investigation are Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son, and Representative Eric Swalwell (D-Ca.). After almost a complete “blackout” about Hunter Biden before the election, it now has been learned that the FBI is investigating Hunter's business dealings, with emphasis on his tax returns and charges of money laundering, while his father, Joe Biden, was vice-president. They are investigating Hunter's involvement in getting “sweetheart deals” in Ukraine, Russia, China, and Kazakhstan, from which he raked in millions of dollars. The question is, did he report all those dollars to the IRS?
How did that involve Joe Biden? We'll find out, hopefully. Before the election, a business partner of Hunter Biden, former retired naval officer, Tony Bobulinski, told a story of what was Hunter's involvement in China, and how Joe Biden was a 10% recipient of the funds provided by the Chinese government to Hunter Biden. He even claimed that he had an actual face-to-face with Joe Biden. Joe has denied any implication that he was involved, but it seems that “where there is smoke, there is fire”, It doesn't look good for “Sleepy Joe” and the truth.
During the Trump impeachment activities by Democrats, from day one of Trump's election, one of his biggest detractors was Representative Eric Swalwell, who along with Representative Adam Schiff, continually accused Trump of being a patsy for Russia and in the pocket of Vladimir Putin. Swalwell and Schiff continually stated that they had “irrefutable” evidence that Trump was involved with the Russians. The Mueller Investigation, after almost 3 years of investigating Trump, with a bevy of Democrat prosecutors, found no collusion or conspiracy by Trump with the Russians. It only took over $30 million of taxpayer money to find out this was a hoax. What a waste of time and money.
Now, the “worm has turned” and Swalwell has been accused of involvement with a female Chinese spy, whom he hired as an aide in his congressional office. Now you have a congressman pointing the finger at the president (falsely), when he was involved with an actual foreign agent in his own office. How can you not call Swalwell a hypocrite, when you have an immoral representative representing our country in Congress and doing what he was accusing the President of doing? Do you think Swalwell fits that description?
Is this what we can expect from a new administration? Will the news media be as skeptical of the Democrats as they were about President Trump and his administration? Don't hold your breath for that to happen. I'll bet that the “fake news” media will continue to hide most negative stories about the Democrats and Joe Biden, after all, they are the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party.
So, don't expect any bombshells, from the “fake news” media, with the exception of Fox News, the NY Post and the Wall Street Journal. It's funny how the media seems to have a case of amnesia when it comes to corruption by the Democrats. You could say journalism is dead in our country as bias seems to be their mode of operation, all in the interest of one party, the Democrats.
May God bless America, as I feel we'll need all his help with this group of reprobates taking over our government.
Conservative commentary by Chuck Lehmann
The November 3, 2020 Presidential election was the biggest crime ever perpetrated against the American people, undermining tradition and protection under our Constitution. Abetting the crime are liberal media sources, who stepped out of their role of calling balls and strikes, to becoming advocates and a driving force in supporting this heinous crime. It is retaliation for failure to put over a false narrative of Russian collusion in the 2016 election, even before President Donald Trump was sworn into the office of the Presidency.
The Mueller Probe was a waste of over 3 productive years at a cost of nearly 32 million dollars, prompted on the word of one anonymous whistleblower. Yet sworn affidavits by hundreds of identifiable whistleblowers can't even stir one justice outlet to review their testimony. I don't know how the double standard evolved between Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and liberals; but it cannot be denied. One is transparent the other opaque.
The Trump administration has been vastly criticized by the press for their openness revealing faults and was quickly pounced upon; whereas the Democrats are protected by selective reporting, omitting pertinent information of implication, and reverting to the racism and xenophobia cards to distract the truth.
Pelosi's and Schumer's favorite mantra against the Republican's, is their refusal to compromise on legislation that translates into, "You don't want to see it our way!"
Conservative Commentary by George Giftos
Those famous robbers from the Old West, the Jesse James Gang, seem to have been reincarnated into today's Democrat Party. According to many experts who observed this past election, the Democrat Party pulled off the greatest election “heist” since the beginning of our democratic republic. They make the Jesse James Gang look like pikers.
Let's look at some of the facts of this past election. President Trump, the incumbent, received more votes than any previous president seeking reelection. In fact, he got 11 million more votes than he did in 2016. Impressive.
That increase can be attributed to the fact that Trump fared better with many key demographic groups and received 95% of the Republican vote. Quite remarkably, Trump grew support among black voters by 50% over 2016 while Biden's support fell below 90% of black voters. In addition, Trump earned 35% of the Hispanic vote.
In previous elections, the Midwestern states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin generally followed the results of Ohio and Iowa, but not this time. While current results show that outside of these few cities, the vote swung in Trump's favor, however, Biden presently 'leads' in these three states. This is largely due to an over abundance of votes from the precincts of Detroit, Philadelphia and Milwaukee, cities with a notorious history for voter irregularities in past elections. Interestingly, more people voted in these cities than were registered to vote, attributing to Biden's questionable 'lead' over Trump. Sounds suspect to me.
Another anomaly, victorious presidential candidates, especially challengers like Biden, usually have down ballot coattails. Biden did not. In fact, all Congressional Republican incumbents won their seats, and at least 12 Republican candidates turned over and won seats from Democrats who were not expected to lose. That alone should raise some “red flags” about the outcome of the Presidential election.
How come on election night, Trump led in all battleground states, but in the early morning hours of November 4th, hundreds of thousands of votes came in with a high 90:10 ratio of Biden to Trump votes? Also, in some areas, late arriving ballots were illegally counted (past the election date cutoff). In Pennsylvania, 23,000 absentee ballots had impossible return dates plus another 86,000 had extraordinary return dates. That raises serious questions and concerns. The rejection rates for absentee ballots usually run a little over 3%, but in this election, the rejection rate was below 1%. Do you smell a Democ-RAT?
What gives rise to the claims that this election was “rigged” is that every questionable vote was in Biden's favor, not Trump's. In addition. Hundreds of thousands of votes had just the Biden box checked off with no down ballot check offs. That is a statistical impossibility as declared by analysts.
This, along with Biden's campaign strategy of campaigning from his basement bunker, and his inability to generate enough excitement to fill a parking lot on the few occasions he left Delaware, make it highly suspect that he could have legally amassed 80 million votes. Compare this to President Trump who crisscrossed the country holding rallies before tens of thousands of highly motivated supporters. The mass media narrative that Biden is our President-Elect, fair and square, just doesn't add up or make any sense.
There's no doubt that the Jesse James Gang would look favorably upon the Democrats for what they did for Joe Biden, in this less than honest and fair election. This is one of the biggest American “heists” ever committed, that would likely spark the envy and adulation of Jesse and his notorious gang.
( Much of the statistical information in this editorial was gleaned from an article by Patrick Basham, Adjunct scholar and Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and the founding Director if the Democracy Institute)
Conservative Commentary by Chuck Lehmann
Back where I grew up in New York City, everybody who was registered to vote, did so on the first Tuesday in November, except the few who were infirm or out of town, in which case they used absentee ballots to vote. On that November day you went into the voting booth, after a voting clerk confirmed your address and verified that your signature matched the one on the voting rolls. Once in the voting booth you closed the curtain, pulled the lever for your candidates, and when you reopened the curtain to exit, your vote had been cast. No hankey-pankey with early voting, or voting weeks and months in advance of the November voting day. No “universal mailed-in ballots” were sent to my house, without my asking, and all votes were tallied and results announced by late evening on election day or early the next morning. It didn't take weeks to know the results, and there were very few claims of illegal votes being cast, unlike today.
So what happened recently with so many election totals being challenged? It seems that modern technology has screwed up our election system. Many Americans have lost confidence in our election process and results, questioning its integrity. Our trust is further weakened with the knowledge that outside companies, with foreign ties, were hired to tally our votes. Using modern cyber technology was supposed to enable us to tally the election results more quickly and accurately, but in reality, the opposite has happened.
It seems one political party, the Democrat Party, has fervently led the charge in altering our voting system, not for the better, but for the worse. By making it easier to vote several weeks in advance, they were able get more of their voters out to vote, whether their ballots were legally cast or not. In many states, the verification of signatures and the requirement of photo I.D's. was disregarded, thereby eliminating safeguards to insure that the person voting was in fact registered and eligible to vote. Also, the Democrats campaigned to have blank voting ballots mailed out to all addresses, regardless if people at those addresses were 'real' voters. It has been alleged that many of those “universal mailed out ballots” were returned without any authentication or validation as to whether they were legitimate or not. As a result, large numbers of ballots were mailed to the tabulation centers, without verification signatures or valid postmarks. Some states actually allowed votes that lacked a valid postmark to be counted days after the November election date. Those decisions were made illegally, because according to the U.S. Constitution, only state legislatures can make voting rules, changes, and procedures, not state governors or state or local election officials.
This past presidential election has brought all these problems to the forefront. Many in the media have claimed that the winner of the election, is Joe Biden, paying absolutely no attention to the charges and evidence of voter fraud manipulation. This is journalistic malpractice at best.
It has been charged that the company hired by most states where allegations of fraud have occurred, is a company with dubious credentials called Dominion Voting Systems. Dominion was acquired by State Street Capital in 2018, founded by former members of George Soros' funded Carlyle Group. In fact, the State of Texas refused to use them because they found them to be lacking in reliability. Even some Democrat politicians, Sen. Amy Klobachar and Sen. Elizabeth Warren complained about the reliability of the Dominion Voting Systems in the past.
My solution to this serious problem of maintaining voting integrity, is to go back to “in-person voting” where photo and signature verification can be ascertained at the time of voting. Also, to insure that we make in-person voting more accessible, voting should be available on the weekend when most people are off from work, as well as on the Monday before election day. Any voting not done in-person should have legal methods to verify the signature and postmark of the absentee ballots. Every “legal” vote should be counted.
We can't have another election like this past one, as most people in both parties believe this election was riddled with fraud. Our right to vote is sacred. Ensuring the integrity of our election process is critical to maintaining our Democratic Republic. Let's return to in-person elections like in the past before modern technology screws up another election.
Conservative Commentary by Chuck Lehmann
Sometimes in order to make a determination, you have to put things side by side for comparison. By looking at the Washington Press Corp's approach in the way they interrogated President Trump, versus their nauseating display of butt smooching questions directed towards Joe Biden, in rare in person scripted press conferences.
Whereas, the President's questioners were randomly picked and extemporaneously answered, Biden's are preselected and his answers are prompted by peeking down at the podium for notes written for him by his handlers, evident during one of his transition press conferences.
The Biden transition team is now busy replenishing the swamp with the slime that the Trump administration cleaned up. The next four years is going to be a reunion of Obama has-beens making a comeback. Stale bread makes a lousy sandwich!
Are the next four years going to be palatable, or will we have to wait for 2024 to find a HERO with fresh ingredients, that pulled us out of the swamp in 2016, and made America Great Again?
Conservative Commentary by George Giftos
Dot #1. It started at the end of 2019, when the COVID-19 virus was thrust upon the world by Communist China. The main targets were the United States and Western Europe, the major economic foes of the Chinese. Ever since Donald Trump assumed the presidency, he had confronted the actions of the Chinese, mainly by challenging their self-serving trade practices, and imposing tariff's on their products entering the United States, which caused them great financial hardship. Therefore, China had reason to want to unseat their nemesis, Donald Trump, especially during the upcoming presidential campaign. They knew that the potent virus they developed in the Chinese City of Wuhan, would be a perfect method in undermining the economy of the United States, thereby hurting Trump politically. They knew that Trump's opponents (the Democrats and the Never-Trumper RINO's) would use the virus as a cudgel over the head of Trump as the virus played havoc all through the year 2020 leading up to the election.
Up until the unleashing of the China virus into the United States, Trump had many notable successes during the first 3 years of his administration. The economy was booming, the stock market hit all-time highs, the unemployment rate was the lowest since the 1940's, as blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and women all reaped the benefit of a low unemployment rate, the result of Trump's tax cuts on corporations and most individuals. He also stimulated businesses by doing away with the onerous regulations put in place under the Obama administration. Trump was riding high as 2020 approached and as the election year commenced.
Dot #2. No matter what great things Trump did for the economy, it all came down during the campaign as to how he handled the China virus. As he confronted the effects of the virus upon the country, he was challenged at every turn by the Democrats in whatever he tried to do, just as the Chinese planned would happen. The media (the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party) sometimes referred to as the “fake news media”, universally condemned and negatively spun events Trump presided over, even though he got praise, sometimes from Democrat governors, including Cuomo of New York and Newsom of California in the beginning, but it was not enough for his political haters, especially as it got closer to the election.
Dot #3. As the virus made itself felt around the country, Democrats, as part of their organized opposition to the Trump administration, started using the virus as an excuse to change the voting procedures in several states, mainly in 'battleground states', which were designated to be the determining factor in electing the next President. Stealthily, the Democrats worked to get many states to institute the voting procedure called “Universal Mail-in Ballots”, whereby blank ballots were mailed out to all potential voters whether or not they requested them. This lax procedure invited fraud, since individual identification wasn't verified and post marks, in some cases, were extended past the November 3rd election date. These changes were illegal as they should have been made through the state legislatures and not by governors and state voting officials, as stated in the U.S. Constitution. As early as late Spring, President Trump stated that this practice of lax voting controls was the only way the Democrats could possibly win the presidential election. No more prescient words were spoken by Trump during the campaign.
Dot #4. As election night on November 3rd was ending, Trump had significant leads in all battleground states. However, when morning arrived, batches of “Universal Mail-in Ballots” were mysteriously delivered to vote counting stations. Suddenly, Trump's substantial lead evaporated and Biden took the lead in the Electoral College and in the total votes “cast”. Charges of fraud and voting irregularities started to emerge from around the country as some people involved in the counting of votes came forth with signed affidavits claiming that many of the votes were being manipulated to give Biden the edge. Trump and his supporters are claiming that the election was rigged and that Trump was the winner. Around 50% of the citizens, mostly Republicans and some Democrats, agree with the assessment that the election was rigged in favor of Biden.
Dot #5. President Trump and his supporters have challenged the results, as it was quite obvious to any objective observer, that there was too much manipulation of votes for the election of Biden, to be considered a fair and honest election. The bar is set very high to expect the President to prevail in having the election overturned, even though the facts validate his position. If Biden prevails, he will serve with a cloud over his head as he tries to run the country.
When all is said and done and you connect the dots, it is evident who truly won this tainted election.
Conservative Commentary by Chuck Lehmann
That phase was used by Supreme Justice Potter Stewart to describe the threshold test for defining obscenity. The same expression can be used when describing the fraudulent presidential election we just witnessed.
Most objective observant people know that the election was not on the up and up. Too many voting patterns and tabulations were not what they should have been. And all those shenanigans benefited, Joe Biden.
On the night of the election, for example, President Trump was headed for a smashing victory in the State of Pennsylvania, but the vote count was halted at around 10 PM. By the morning, votes from the voting corrupt cities of Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, rolled in an over-whelming number consisting of mostly Biden ballots. How did these votes miraculously show up to turn the election to Joe Biden? Did the word go out that Biden votes were needed immediately? You make the call.
The same thing happened in other cities such as Detroit, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Las Vegas, Phoenix etc., all controlled by Democrats. How come all the reports of voter fraud were in those cities just mentioned? Was that just a coincidence? Why isn't the news media interested in seeing whether these reports of voter fraud were valid or not? Do they have a bias to not try to invalidate the election of their favorite son, Joe Biden? Is the Pope Catholic?
It makes no sense that all the final election totals that were decisive were in Democrat cities and states. Hundreds of affidavits have been gathered, from concerned voting workers, claiming that voting irregularities, all favoring Joe Biden, were prevalent in most of the swing states. How come, according to predictions by the “fake news media” of a national “Blue Wave”, that the only “Blue Wave” that occurred was for Joe Biden and not the down ballot Democrats? The Republicans will, hopefully, retain the Senate after the Georgia run-off races, in addition, the Republicans returned all their incumbent Congressional seats plus they gained 12 more seats, and they won control of a few more state legislatures, which they were predicted to lose. On top of those Republican gains, Joe Biden, the phantom candidate, supposedly got 5 million more votes than President Trump. Do you “smell a rat”?
How can a cognitively impaired candidate who has trouble expressing himself without the use of a teleprompter, who had trouble with facts and statistics, who campaigned from his basement bunker almost exclusively, and when did venture out from his basement, he addressed 20 to 50 people with few questions from reporters? In addition, in order to gain support of the “Progressive Wing” of the Democrat Party, he signed a “Manifesto” with Socialist Bernie Sanders vowing to carry out Bernie's policies if elected. Comparing Biden's campaign style to the energetic Donald Trump, who crisscrossed the country holding campaign rallies where tens of thousands of supporters showed up with wild enthusiasm. It makes no sense that Biden should've generated so much more support as compared with Trump.
The voting changes, such as “Universal mail in ballots”, extending the voting period to over a month before the regular voting date of Nov. 3, the lack of observers representing the Republicans who were denied access as to how the votes were being counted, and a lack of verification of valid signatures and postmarks dated before election day, was all part of the chaos that we are facing now. Also, it has been reported that hundreds of thousands of votes only had a check mark for Joe Biden with no check marks for down ballot candidates. That's almost statistically impossible, some maybe, but not hundreds of thousands. That points to fraud.
If we don't fix this mishmash of voting changes after this election, we'll see a repeat of this election in the future almost guaranteeing Democrat victories ad infinitum. Remember what U.S.S.R. butcher, Josef Stalin, once stated, “Those Who Vote Decide Nothing, Those Who Count the Vote Decide Everything”. We can't let this be the determining factor in future elections.
We know voter fraud when we see it.
Conservative Commentary by Chuck Lehmann
Visit the Gallery tab to view these cartoons and more in higher resolution!