Chuck on the right side
THIS IS A BLOG THAT TRIES TO APPEAL TO THE AVERAGE CONSERVATIVE CITIZEN AND HAS NO AGENDA OTHER THAN TELLING THE TRUTH AS WE SEE IT.
If you inquire as to whether or not the 2020 election was on the “up and up”, you may be called a “conspiracy nut”, “an election denier”, an “enemy of our democracy”, and/or other epithets mocking you for questioning the election process and its outcomes. Are there valid reasons why these inquiries should generate such vitriol or, are such concerns about the veracity of the 2020 election justifiable?
Remember when, just a few years ago, elections were only held on the 1st Tuesday of November, with few exceptions or incidents? The votes were counted and a valid winner was declared within hours or a day from the close of the polls on that Tuesday. In recent years we have abandoned this tradition by turning the “sacred” right of voting on its head, especially during the 2020 election. What has changed? For one thing, some mega rich people, by the names of Mark Zuckerberg and the notorious George Soros, and organizations with nice sounding names, have involved themselves in getting election laws changed, mainly for the benefit of the Democrat Party. How did these persons and groups inject themselves in the voting process to favor one party over another, trying to skew the election outcome? They did not directly use their money for a particular party or candidate, they used organizations to do their “dirty” work for them. George Soros' “Open Society Foundation”, Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg, and the groups he funded called the “Center for Tech and Civic Life” and the “Center for Election Innovation and Research”, funneled money around the country to change the voting laws that directly affected the Presidential election, and various other elections for federal and state offices. Here is what this infusion of money brought about in the election of 2020. • they promoted universal mail-in voting • they worked to extend voting deadlines • they favored mail-in voting over in-person voting • they expanded opportunities for “ballot curing” • they worked to expand unmonitored private drop boxes •they worked to allow post election day ballots to be counted which created opportunities for illegal “ballot harvesting” In the case of Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, he spent $419 million of his own money to facilitate the changes mentioned above, especially in the “Battleground States” of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Nevada etc. Should these activities, be dismissed as “sour grapes” by the Republicans, as they question what happened leading up to the 2020 election? Any critical thinker has to wonder how Presidential candidate, Joe Biden, could have generated a record number of votes by conducting his campaign primarily from his home basement and from a few, poorly attended, in-person, parking lot 'rallies'. Compare this to his opponent, Donald Trump, who easily generated crowds of 20,000 to 40,000 enthusiastic supporters as he campaigned throughout the country. City after city, Trump filled venue after venue, often times leaving thousands of supporters standing in the shadows, as part of the 'overflow'. Yet, the favored candidate of Soros, Zuckerberg and the social media was Joe Biden. Why is that and how did Joe Biden miraculously generate over 80 million votes? Was it because of his charming personality and his political expertise, or was it the surreptitious support generated by the above named actors and a biased media? It might be mentioned that Donald Trump got 10 million more votes in 2020 than he got in 2016, with no voting changes made for his benefit. Yet, he still lost? Does that meet the smell test? Shouldn't an investigation be held to see what happened and how we can make future elections secure and reliable, regardless of political parties involved? In relation to the 2020 election, the Washington Examiner had this comment on the election. “By using the excuse of the COVID-19 emergency, over $400 million was spent through two liberal leaning 501(c)(3) organizations under the guise of supporting a safe election during the pandemic of 2020. What ended up happening amounted to an enormous Democrat voter turnout operation complete with more mail-in voting, insecure drop boxes, recruiting poll workers, and ballot curing - funded via courtesy of “Zuck Bucks”. So, as our headline asks, "Was the 2020 election on the up and up?", what do you think now? Conservative Commentary by Chuck Lehmann
1 Comment
Jim Landis
9/12/2022 11:43:32 am
If you think the 2020 election was on the "up and up", then I have a Bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you? How come all the election change laws benefited the Democrats and not the Republicans? Do you smell a rat?
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
April 2024
Visit the Gallery tab to view these cartoons and more in higher resolution!
CONSERVATIVE SITES
|